Urban Go-Team 2014

Adventures in Elections & Voting

June 3, 2014
by Maddie
Comments Off on Blogging Day 2: Maddie

Blogging Day 2: Maddie

Today was awesome!  We had such a diverse and intriguing panel discussion.  All of the speakers had unique characteristics and did a wonderful job of showing the good things that can come out of politics, explaining how campaigns are run, and sharing their own personal struggles in different elected positions.

I was very interested in the idea that politics favor only one type of politician, radical and extreme, rather than appealing to both extreme and moderate party members.  Many of the panelist speakers acknowledged that the party system may not seem fair or just in the legislature, but if roles were reversed it may not be very different.  It was interesting to also see that Democrats, Republicans, and Independents all experiencing similar campaigning strategies and chose “grass-roots” ways of knowing on potential voters doors.  I learned that it is very important to find a home base or target a specific group of voters who you can count on instead of trying to reach everyone.

The amount of money that was spent on some campaigns in Missouri made me cringe.  It depresses me that we waste (technically spend) so much money on campaigning.  Not to mention that Missouri has such a low voter turnout.  Many of the speakers today mentioned that it is not their responsibility to educate people on how to register to vote; their only responsibility is to educate the public on their own opinions and beliefs.

I love looking at the different ads throughout the years – educational, aggressive, passive, pleasant, creepy, funny, scary, etc.  Can’t wait to make my own ad!

June 3, 2014
by Amanda
Comments Off on Day Two Reflection: Amanda

Day Two Reflection: Amanda

Reflections on the Panel

I really loved how open the panelists were, especially Mr. Finny. I thought it was great how they wanted to come and talk to high school students even if most of us cannot vote yet. I mean, it may mean they receive votes in the future, but they decided to share their time with us, which was really great.

Most of the time, politicians seem sort of far away, like they’re above the population. It was cool to see that they’re really people too, and they have to work hard and earn their way up. They really do seem to work hard. 300? 1700? That’s a lot of doors! That’s more people than I could ever imagine meeting in a month or two! It’s amazing how much they do and how completely they give themselves over to fighting for a spot, a spot they can use to pass laws and right wrongs. It really seems like a great thing to do, and they are awesome citizens for doing so.

Also, afterward, it was fun to talk with them a bit more. Newman was talking about being a minority in the House and how it wasn’t about getting things passed as much as stopping the bad. (That would explain why Congress never passes any bills!) I thought that was sort of strange, since you would think that people wouldn’t just want to use their power in the way she described. They’d actually want to get something done. I guess that’s why there are so many representatives–to balance out the wise and the stupid, politically seeking.

Reflection on the Intro to Campaign Advertisements

Nowadays, campaigns are more about knocking the opposing side down than showing your credibility or promoting yourself. At best, it might be a mix of the two. It takes negativism and also a lot of physiological tactics. For example, with negativism, the opponent is in black and white or dark colors, and the sponsor is in bright color. Even in the Eisenhower commercials, they had the normal citizens looking up-right and Eisenhower down-left so that he looked “above” them.

One way ads have evolved is that they, like all television, are more pleasing to watch. Even when people moan and groan about them, politicians have invented new ways to keep people’s attention instead of making them want to fast-forward, like the neutral colors in one example we saw. I think I’d like to do the same tomorrow–use calmer colors and a happier look. That, or use harsh negativism. That’s always fun, too.

June 3, 2014
by Emma
Comments Off on Reflections on Day 2

Reflections on Day 2

Today was an interesting day filled with the elected voices of the people and the voices from the past. As different experiences were share I can certainly say that we all took something away from Reggy Finney,Linda  Rallo, Tracey McCreery, Stacey Newman, and Charlie Dooley. I personally joined that they were regular people, in the sense that they had degrees from all over the place from Reggy Finney’s degree in mathematics and partial in theology to Stacey Newman’s flight attendant career, and they ran for the betterment of their district. I enjoyed that they did not try to disillusion us on how hard it is to be in politics as we saw in how hard they all campaign  and to get bills and agendas passed as some of us heard from Tracey McCreery and her three hour wait to speak about abortion. The use of the old fashion campaign surprised me because I have never seen a candidate themselves knocking on doors, and Newman’s use of social media is something I loved. I was a little dismayed by the fact they didn’t go into the types of people they excepted to receive support from more and who exactly they were selling their ‘product’ too as well as why they believed our state has such a low voter turn out. I would like to thank them all for the insight they gave to a group of people that want to be informed and want to be involved. We also watched all presidential TV ads at went from cartoon songs to “scary movie voice” remarks. I found a lot of similarities in the qualifications for president and targeted people. I was a little angered at smear campaigns because it makes me question how much of the information has been skewed somehow. I am still excited to make an ad tomorrow for whatever topic that might been, though I know some specifically I could just run with now.

Emma

June 3, 2014
by Carol
Comments Off on Day Two Reflection: Carol

Day Two Reflection: Carol

Our panelists talked a lot of ways to be involved with campaigns and elections—not just as a candidate, but also as a volunteer or staffer. Could you see yourself as a politician, in a support role? Compared to our panelists, how do you think you would approach your campaign?

  • Even though working as a staffer wasn’t particularly highlighted during the panel discussion- my car group had an interesting discussion pertaining to the matter on the way to lunch. We thought that the staffers may be more influential in policy making than the actual candidates themselves. A lot of the candidates have various backgrounds (a lot of them are not schooled in politics) but their STAFFERS are! These people are mostly college students who intern over the summer, and these students are studying political sciences and such.  On a trip to Washington DC I took with my family a few years back, we got to have a private audience with governor Mike Pence (who is a very close family friend) and we were taken down secret tunnels and such that the general public doesn’t get access to (because naturally, we were running late). And going behind the scenes on Capitol Hill, I realized that it was the staffer’s job to make sure that everything runs smoothly, and without their enormous contributions I don’t think our senators/ representatives/ etc. would be able to function like they do. So even though it is a lot of work, I could see myself as a staffer- because I think that they hold the glue that keeps Washington together.

June 3, 2014
by Rossella
Comments Off on Day 2 Reflection: Rossella

Day 2 Reflection: Rossella

Were there any comments by the panelists that struck you as especially true, upsetting, inspiring, and/or thought provoking? What were the stories that stood out to you?

One of the democratic panelists spoke about how her struggle in the Missouri house isn’t getting bills passed, but “making the evil that’s being churned out less bad.” With such a distorted ratio of Republicans to Democrats in the house, the minority has very few chances to contribute at all. It leaves a very un-optimistic take on the future of Missouri politics.

Did the panelists’ experiences as Democrats, Republicans, and/or independents change the way you thought about party politics, and if so, how? What about the role of political parties—what did you learn about bipartisanship, and our political power structures

All the panelists had different experiences with partisanship depending on their position in the state. County Executive Dooley, for example, said that political divisions didn’t stop over 70% of his political funds coming from Republicans with a keen interest in their areas. It taught me that smart investors don’t stop at party lines but invest in whatever falls into being in their best interest.

What did you learn about political strategy (door knocking, base building, etc.), and how those strategies can change over of the course of a campaign?

Many of the panelists began their campaigns as relative unknowns and began their campaigns by focusing on a single issue. They said that the main way to gather votes in their campaigns was to go door to door and talk to voters. Apparently their biggest struggle wasn’t getting people to vote for them specifically, but more so just getting people to come out to vote at all.

Many of you struck up conversations with our guests after the formal panel. What did you talk about? Did you pick up their cards? How might you continue the conversation, with these panelists or others?

After the panel discussion, the panelists were more willing to speak to us about their personal fights in their respective areas of the government regarding the issues that they care about right now. Also, while I didn’t pick up any cards, both Rep. Newman and Rep. McCreery followed me back on Twitter! Hopefully this networking experience will come to fruition sometime in the future.

Our panelists talked a lot of ways to be involved with campaigns and elections—not just as a candidate, but also as a volunteer or staffer. Could you see yourself as a politician, in a support role? Compared to our panelists, how do you think you would approach your campaign?

Campaigning is a big undertaking and usually requires a lot of money. However, if I were to help a campaign as a volunteer, I’d think that I would be best able to help through getting voters informed over the phone or by going door to door, as many of the panelists said were essential to winning a campaign.

Besides the above questions, my biggest takeaway from the event was how many times each panelist had lost an election and how differently they all responded to failure. However, their presence as members of the Missouri legislature showed me that successful failures are key to future success; truly, we should never give up if we are passionate about something.

June 3, 2014
by Margaret
Comments Off on Day 2-Reflection

Day 2-Reflection

Where there any comments by the panelists that struck you as especially true, upsetting, inspiring, and/or thought provoking? What were the stories that stood out to you?

 

I enjoyed how realistic the politicians were. Each of them understood each other and were more than happy to listen to the others on the panel and the audience. None of them were egotistical about their positions. I found this really pertinent and eye-catching because I feel like many citizens don’t realize that there are political individuals that use their jobs as tools to reach out to their community. They seemed to all try to make a difference in their areas! I found that extremely impressive. I have come across a local politician who usually makes empty promises and stands back from the community, participating in new contracts that the citizens absolutely oppose.

Overall, this experience was enlightening because I finally met some political individuals that found it important to reach out to the general public in their jobs. I believe that every student in that room felt that they were experiencing something with a “real” person that day, instead of a figure or persona that signs dumb contracts that the city has to vote on. They work, they participate, and they prosper.

June 3, 2014
by Katherine
Comments Off on Day 2 Reflection

Day 2 Reflection

I thought that today went very well, and I enjoyed it very much. I thought the group of officials was well picked and the right number, but it would have been cool to hear from a campaign staff member as well. I found it interesting that Reginald Finney was able to win his election with only $499. Even though it is nearly impossible, I know I would want to spend that type of money in an election if I ran. I thought the reasoning behind running for office was inspiring. I liked how Finney saw a need for black representation and took the initiative to do so, and I was inspired by Tracy when she ran against her own party as an individual. Overall, I thought all of the officials displayed the different levels of government well and were very open and honest. In regards to the last question, even though I have no idea what I am going to do in life, being a politician or staff member interests me. I think I am open to getting a degree in political science and being a staff member if I found a candidate I respected. If I was going to become a candidate myself, I think I would still want to pursue a political science degree even though I saw that it is not necessary. I say this because I think I would feel out of control of my own campaign. Even though I believe staff members are important and necessary for candidates to win, I also believe that they can hold too much power in the campaign process. I think that candidates can only lead their staff if they also have a background in political science. This background would turn the campaign manager into an adviser instead of  a manager. Even though there are plenty of unique and great officials without a political science degree, I believe it would aid the transition from a citizen to an elected official. In the end, the day was great. I loved the panel and the campaign videos. I am looking forward to tomorrow! 🙂

June 3, 2014
by Jasen
1 Comment

Day 2: Jasen

Unfortunately, I dropped the ball on the first two days of blogging. I have saved drafts, but the perfectionist inside me says I shouldn’t publish them now since I rushed to partially complete them. Also, I believe they would pop up above Bobbi’s most recent post and mess everything up.

Today, I was very moved by the elected officials sitting down in one room together and discussing with high schoolers. I think what impressed me the most was the malleability of their political affiliation. Representative Stacey Newman had (if I may so myself) wonderful ideologies on social issues that were forged by experiences in her lifetime. Her story alone was amusing. And, although Newman was democratic, she listened intently to the Republican of the room, Alderman Linda Rallo. Rallo also seemed to amaze me.  Although she was a self-proclaimed ‘fiscal’ conservative, she was pro-choice, and a moderate republican. Rarity and individuality in a career such as hers is career suicide. I find it very admirable that she sticks to her guns on issues that she is passionate about. The other individuals in the room were also moderate and pliable.

That is what blew my mind. The moderate and rational tone was remarkable. Different people with different political parties had a calm conversation. Perhaps this cooperation can be indebted to the shared campaigning experiences (the main topic of discussion), or by the lack of media attention given to small events like a high school program. Regardless, their behavior impressively contrasted the morally undeveloped attitudes at the board of elections. The black and white opinion smearing of politics seemed to be non-existent today. I enjoyed that.

June 3, 2014
by Allison
Comments Off on Blogging Day 2: Candidates and Elected Officials Panel & Introduction to Political Polling

Blogging Day 2: Candidates and Elected Officials Panel & Introduction to Political Polling

Reflections on the Panel

Share any reflections you had on today’s panel. Here are some questions to consider, but you don’t have to stick to these—feel free to freewrite!

Where there any comments by the panelists that struck you as especially true, upsetting, inspiring, and/or thought provoking? What were the stories that stood out to you?

Did the panelists’ experiences as Democrats, Republicans, and/or independents change the way you thought about party politics, and if so, how? What about the role of political parties—what did you learn about bipartisanship, and our political power structures

What did you learn about political strategy (door knocking, base building, etc.), and how those strategies can change over of the course of a campaign?

Many of you struck up conversations with our guests after the formal panel. What did you talk about? Did you pick up their cards? How might you continue the conversation, with these panelists or others?

Our panelists talked a lot of ways to be involved with campaigns and elections—not just as a candidate, but also as a volunteer or staffer. Could you see yourself as a politician, in a support role? Compared to our panelists, how do you think you would approach your campaign?

Anything else you want to share?

 

Reflection on the Intro to Campaign Advertisements

Our panelists made several comments about the crucial role advertising plaid in their campaigns—one even went so far as to say tha , if you’re running for a political office, “you are a product.” What do you think it takes to be savvy at that kind of self-promotion? What tactics did the panelists mention?

Did you have a favorite ad out of the ones we watched today? Based on the ads we watched, what common themes do you notice? How do campaign ads seem to have evolved over the decades?

What did you notice about of the ads, not just in content, but also form (music, casting, script, storyline)? How do you think these elements come together to make an effective (or ineffective) ad?

Think about how you might approach making your ads tomorrow. How do you think you might apply some of the insights/examples from the panelists and Bobbi’s presentation?